Accueil
| Titre : | Autonomy and Control in Mass Remote Working during the COVID-19 Pandemic. A Cross-Occupational Comparison (2022) |
| Auteurs : | Marta Fana ; Francesco Sabato Massimo ; Angelo Moro |
| Type de document : | Article : document électronique |
| Dans : | Relations industrielles / Industrial relations (vol. 77, n° 3, Eté 2022) |
| Article en page(s) : | Diffusion numérique : 30 novembre 2022 |
| Langues: | Anglais |
| Catégories : |
Thésaurus CEREQ CRISE SANITAIRE ; TELETRAVAIL ; ORGANISATION DU TRAVAIL ; ENCADREMENT ; NTI - NOUVELLE TECHNOLOGIE DE L'INFORMATION ; AUTONOMIE PROFESSIONNELLE ; FRANCE ; ITALIE ; COMPARAISON INTERNATIONALE |
| Mots-clés: | Covid-19 |
| Résumé : |
The global COVID-19 pandemic acted as an exogenous shock that forced organizations to adopt homeworking as a common form of work for many occupations. By that time researchers had been stressing the gap between technical feasibility of homeworking – reaching on average one third of employment in both the US and EU28 (Dingel and Neiman 2020, Sostero et al. 2020) – and its practical adoption in organisations. The massive shift to homeworking during the pandemic – especially in countries such as France and Italy, which both experienced a widespread lockdown during the first wave – has been an opportunity to study homeworking across a large and heterogeneous cross-section of occupations and sectors. To that end, the Joint Research Centre of the European Commission (in Seville) funded real-time cross-occupational qualitative research on which this paper is based.
First, drawing on studies that attribute the delayed spread of homeworking to the dialectic between workers' self-latitude and managerial control, we examined how compulsory homeworking affected workers’ self-latitude to define and perform their tasks. We identified two different phases and temporary arrangements of the worker self-latitude/managerial control dialectic during the time under study. Second, we analyzed how different forms of control developed under the new organization of work. Specifically, we studied how the outcomes varied by occupation and along the vertical division of labour. Our results suggest an ongoing hybridization of personal, technical and bureaucratic forms of control. Accordingly, we agree with labour process theorists who argue that personal, bureaucratic and technical forms of control complement each other, rather than being stages of a linear and functionalist succession. |
| Document Céreq : | Non |
| En ligne : | https://doi.org/10.7202/1094210ar |
